The (much-needed) results audit of the recovery and resilience mechanism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71296/rarap.455Keywords:
control, result, follow-up, reinforcement, effectiveness, efficiency, continuityAbstract
The Recovery and Resilience Facility establishes, as one of its fundamental targets, the control and monitoring of the financed projects and their development, linking the receipt of funds to their proper use in order to maximize their effectiveness and efficiency but also with the ultimate aim of achieving an economic development of the States and a reinforcement of their structures that allow them to face future crises with greater guarantees of recovery and minimize their negative effects.
This required control fixes with the performance audit, which extends the focus of analysis beyond legal compliance and the true and fair view of the assets, to verify if the result obtained with the actions carried out is adequate, effective, and efficient and if its impact on its development area and on Society is positive and fix to the targets set. This follow-up analysis required by the Mechanism for its actions must be maintained over time precisely as one of the achievements of the Recovery and Resilience Facility and the national Plan. From the perspective of public spending and its mandatory effectiveness and efficiency, the spending review is shown as a proper evaluation. Besides, other evaluations of public policies should be done to complement it to provide a global vision of the public action impact and result.
Downloads
References
AEVAL (2015): Guía Práctica para el diseño y la realización de evaluaciones de políticas públicas.
AIREF (2017): Plan de acción de la revisión del gasto en subvenciones del conjunto de las Administraciones Públicas.
AIREF (2019): Plan de acción de la revisión del gasto del conjunto de las Administraciones Públicas (FASE II).
MORAL-ARCE, Ignacio (2018): Revisiones de gasto con enfoque de género, una aproximación desde la experiencia comparada internacional.
OCDE, ROBINSON, Marc (2013): Spending reviews (GOV/PGC/SBO (2013).
OCDE (2010): Estándares de calidad para la evaluación del desarrollo (2010).
OCDE (2019): Mejores criterios para una evaluación (2019).
WORLD BANK (2010): Handbook on impact evaluation. Quantitative methods and practices (2010).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

